Has self-regulation of greyhound racing had too many chances?

Greyhound racing started in the UK in 1926.  The National Greyhound Racing Club oversaw racing from 1928.  In 2006 The Sunday Times revealed a Seaham builders’ merchant had killed 10,000 greyhounds over 15 years using a bolt gun for £10 a dog. This catalysed public outrage and a chain of enquiries which have brought about limited change:

  • 2006: an All-Party Parliamentary Group for Animal Welfare called inter alia for the racing industry to be required by law to record and publish annual injuries on a central database.
  • 2007: Lord Donoughue’s report conducted on behalf of the racing industry focused on self-regulation and anonymous data recording.
  • 2009: The Greyhound Board of Great Britain replaced the National Greyhound Racing Club.
  • 2010: Welfare of Racing Greyhounds Regulations introduced.
  • 2016: DEFRA Post-Implementation Review of the 2010 Regulations.  The Regulations were considered to be “successful” subject to some caveats. The DEFRA review agreed that GBGB should have done more in the preceding 5 years to be transparent.  DEFRA committed to consider other approaches including regulation if necessary.
  • 2015/16: The Select Committee on Environmental Food and Rural Affairs (EFRA) reviewed the 2010 Regulations.  Again the lack of data made it difficult to judge the welfare provision. The GBGB had been collecting data but not collating it centrally.  EFRA proposed a 2-year probationary period
  • 2015 DEFRA secured the GBGB’s commitment to publish statistics with a full data set to be ready by end 2017.  The final and complete 2017 stats were published in January 2019.  Incomplete data was published in March 2018 failing to take account of the 6 month time lag in retirement figures.  
  • 2016: the GBGB agreed to develop a Publicly Available Specification through the BSI for trainers’ kennels off-track and have it incorporated into its UKAS accreditation by December 2017.  This has been delayed until 2021.
  • 2018: GBGB announced its “Greyhound Commitment”, a welfare reform programme. It conveniently converted EFRA’s proposed 2 year probationary period into a 7 year breathing space.
  • 2018: All Parliamentary Dog Advisory Welfare Group (APDAWG) meeting: “Greyhound Racing in the UK: an Update on Welfare”.  Prof. Andrew Knight presented:  “Injuries in Racing Greyhounds” which prompted Forever Hounds Trust to change from a neutral position to one of opposition to greyhound racing. FHT called for racing to be phased out.
  • 2019 (May 22nd): Greyhound Forum discussed Prof. Knight’s report and the GBGB agreed to meet Prof. Knight to discuss updated science.  To date the GBGB has not pursued this.

Taking the last 15 years together with the serious and persistent concerns about greyhound welfare as well as the lack of public accountability, the time has come for greyhound racing to end.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *